Twitter trumpsatariano new yorktimes

Facebook and Twitter Face International Scrutiny After Trump …

Facebook and Twitter Face International Scrutiny After Trump Ban – The New York Times

17.1.2021 — After Barring Trump, Facebook and Twitter Face Scrutiny About Inaction Abroad … Adam Satariano is a technology reporter based in London.

Human rights groups and activists have spent years urging the companies to do more to remove content that encouraged violence.

The People Onscreen Are Fake. The Disinformation Is Real.

How Deepfake Videos Are Used to Spread Disinformation – The New York Times

7.2.2023 — Adam Satariano, based in London, and Paul Mozur, based in Seoul, are tech correspondents who report internationally about online …

For the first time, A.I.-generated personas, often used for corporate trainings, were detected in a state-aligned information campaign — opening a new chapter in online manipulation.

The New York Times (@nytimes) / Twitter

Here’s a guide to how you can keep up with The New York Times, on and off Twitter. @nytimes. shares news to help you understand the world.

Adam Satariano – Twitter

Adam Satariano. @satariano … Adam Satariano Retweeted · Anton Troianovski … A New Role for Sapna Maheshwari | The New York Times Company.

Helsingin Sanomat on Twitter: “New York Times: Presidentti …

2.10.2018 — New York Times: Presidentti Trump syyllistyi ”suoranaisiin petoksiin” järjestellessään isältään saamiaan satoja miljoonia dollareita.

Pui-Wing Tam (@puiwingtam) / Twitter

The other night, I had a disturbing, two-hour conversation with Bing’s new AI chatbot. The AI told me its real name (Sydney), detailed dark and violent …

Regulating Free Speech in a Digital Age: Hate, Harm and the …

Regulating Free Speech in a Digital Age: Hate, Harm and the Limits of Censorship – David Bromell – Google-kirjat

“Russia will not become a democracy until it falls apart,” writes Oksana Zabuzhko. “That’s because Russia is not really a nation-state but the same …

Hateful thoughts and words can lead to harmful actions like the March 2019 terrorist attack on mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand. In free, open and democratic societies, governments cannot justifiably regulate what citizens think, feel, believe or value, but do have a duty to protect citizens from harmful communication that incites discrimination, active hostility and violence.Written by a public policy advisor for fellow practitioners in politics and public life, this book discusses significant practical and moral challenges regarding internet governance and freedom of speech, particularly when responding to content that is legal but harmful. Policy makers and professionals working for governmental institutions need to strike a fair balance between protecting from harm and preserving the right to freedom of expression. And because merely passing laws does not solve complex social problems, governments need to invest, not just regulate. Governments, big tech and the private sector, civil society, individual citizens and the fourth estate all have roles to play, and counter-speech is everyone’s responsibility.This book tackles hard questions about internet governance, hate speech, cancel culture and the loss of civility, and illustrates principled pragmatism applied to perplexing policy problems. Furthermore, it presents counter-speech strategies as alternatives and complements to censorship and criminalisation.

The Fight for Free Speech: Ten Cases That Define Our First …

The Fight for Free Speech: Ten Cases That Define Our First Amendment Freedoms – Ian Rosenberg – Google-kirjat

A user’s guide to understanding contemporary free speech issues in the United StatesAmericans today are confronted by a barrage of questions relating to their free speech freedoms. What are libel laws, and do they need to be changed to stop the press from lying? Does Colin Kaepernick have the right to take a knee? Can Saturday Night Live be punished for parody? While citizens are grappling with these questions, they generally have nowhere to turn to learn about the extent of their First Amendment rights. The Fight for Free Speech answers this call with an accessible, engaging user’s guide to free speech. Media lawyer Ian Rosenberg distills the spectrum of free speech law down to ten critical issues. Each chapter in this book focuses on a contemporary free speech question—from student walkouts for gun safety to Samantha Bee’s expletives, from Nazis marching in Charlottesville to the muting of adult film star Stormy Daniels— and then identifies, unpacks, and explains the key Supreme Court case that provides the answers. Together these fascinating stories create a practical framework for understanding where our free speech protections originated and how they can develop in the future. As people on all sides of the political spectrum are demanding their right to speak and be heard, The Fight for Free Speech is a handbook for combating authoritarianism, protecting our democracy, and bringing an understanding of free speech law to all.

Dangerous Ideas: A Brief History of Censorship in the West, …

Dangerous Ideas: A Brief History of Censorship in the West, from the … – Eric Berkowitz – Google-kirjat

A fascinating examination of how restricting speech has continuously shaped our culture, and how censorship is used as a tool to prop up authorities and maintain class and gender disparitiesThrough compelling narrative, historian Eric Berkowitz reveals how drastically censorship has shaped our modern society. More than just a history of censorship, Dangerous Ideas illuminates the power of restricting speech; how it has defined states, ideas, and culture; and (despite how each of us would like to believe otherwise) how it is something we all participate in.This engaging cultural history of censorship and thought suppression throughout the ages takes readers from the first Chinese emperor’s wholesale elimination of books, to Henry VIII’s decree of death for anyone who “imagined” his demise, and on to the attack on Charlie Hebdo and the volatile politics surrounding censorship of social media.Highlighting the base impulses driving many famous acts of suppression, Berkowitz demonstrates the fragility of power and how every individual can act as both the suppressor and the suppressed.

New York Times Opinion (@nytopinion) / Twitter

Keywords: twitter trumpsatariano new yorktimes